| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
glibcxx/libc++ (#3894)
most stdlibc++ already provide this functionality out of the box, very consistently and well implemented (usually)
my main irk is that the llvm itanium demangle is totally unescesary when there is a perfectly stable, tested and well documented equivalent functionality in the standard stdc++ provided in most UNIX oses
its mostly to reduce binary size by a very thin margin, but he stdc++ is more than capable of doing he same behaviour we use a dpeendency for
for mingw or such howeger,, demangling becomies trickier so we have to exclude windows entirely because well windows likes to do things differently dont they
Signed-off-by: lizzie <lizzie@eden-emu.dev>
Reviewed-on: https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden/pulls/3894
Reviewed-by: crueter <crueter@eden-emu.dev>
Reviewed-by: MaranBr <maranbr@eden-emu.dev>
|
